Dyson Case Study
You and your group represent David Dyson (the sole shareholder) who has decided to relocate the business enterprise from the UK to Malaysia. In Mister Dyson's watch, this was a key decision for the future of the company. It would not merely make the organization ‘leaner' and more efficient, but also in increase revenue and help make the firm even more competitive. This relocation decision was not up for negotiation within your view and was centered solely on the ‘bottom line'. Stakeholders can eventually view it is for the very best and will come to your state of mind.
In this issue, and making use of the information in this instance study you have to now encourage your labor force, the workers unions and the remaining portion of the stakeholders engaged, that this last relocation decision makes sense. You should outline all the pro's of moving out in the UK, all of the pro's of moving into Malaysia and express clearly and ambiguously which the ‘costs' of staying in the UK had been just as well great. You should highlight the R& Deb jobs being created in the UK (which are higher abilities and larger paid careers than those lost)
You should highlight the following key points:
Financial Good move
Political Reasons to maneuver
Competitive Good move
Location ‘Mix' Great move
Riches Reasons to approach
You and the team stand for the staff, the workers unions and the various stakeholders who are completely against this approach. You are very cross and angry that you had no state whatsoever from this relocation along with working for the company since 93 in Malmesbury and relocating most of your families there, children into schools and building up well established communities since that time, you are hurt and annoyed at the most recent story.
In this debate, you should be telling the administration of this business, that with no workforce plus the dedication both you and your crew gave to the company within the last few years, the organization would not end up being anywhere...